As shocking as this may come to you, dear readers, I have a pet peeve or two when it comes to photographers. I also have a pet peeve with people who use the term “pet peeve” but that is neither here nor there. Anyway, words that grate on my ears include “I’m a natural light shooter.” That’s code for “I don’t know how to use a strobe.” Shouldn’t we just be…light shooters? Regardless of whether it’s artificial, ambient or modified, so long as it communicates what we need in an image?

Along those lines, DWF superstar Dave Cheung has dropped an informative and insightful post on the QuiKeys blog about using off-camera flash at receptions. Dave has a slightly different take on off-camera lighting at receptions than most people. Most photographers who light their receptions are using flashes to overpower the ambient light (that’s generally what I do, anyway), but Dave suggests merely accenting it instead. It’s trickier than you think, because flashes are just too powerful. Quoth the Dave:

“For this post, I’m talking about dark venues. Really dark venues.  Take, for example, last weekend’s reception venue with an ambient light reading of 3200ISO, 1/80 and f2.  When I say “low-powered flash” I mean having to add a 3-stop neutral density gel to a Nikon SB900 or Canon 580EXII manually set to 1/128 power to balance the fore-mentioned low light levels and still having to shoot at 1600ISO and f2.”

Later in the post Dave calls for camera makers to consider creating a lower-powered mini-flash to help photographers add just the slightest pops to images without having to add gel after gel to standard Canon and Nikon fare to power them down to usable levels. What do you think? Ultra low-powered flash: useful tool for pros, or niche toy? Let Dave and the DWF know.

dave-cheung-lowlight-flash

Back Home

Possibly Related Posts: