Nope – don’t like it, and not just because of how bizarre you will look when shooting. I don’t like how the lens is so exposed to the elements at the bottom, that is the part that needs the most protection! As for security, it seems like this will draw far more attention to you than not.
It’s a stupid design. Looking ok when you are not shooting photos. Once you take photos with the bag, it’s worse than ppl seeing your camera. At least, I will look at you more than 10 seconds.
"Matt Thompson, the CEO of Songfreedom heads up a discussion around your questions with two of our industry leaders, Jason Groupp and Doug Gordon."[...] Read the rest »
February 8th, 2012
3 Comments at "camerabag"
Nope – don’t like it, and not just because of how bizarre you will look when shooting. I don’t like how the lens is so exposed to the elements at the bottom, that is the part that needs the most protection! As for security, it seems like this will draw far more attention to you than not.
Interesting idea though…
I like it!
You may be obvious for the short time it takes to get a shot … but while carrying, not so much.
I like that you can zip the bottom to protect the lens if your not shooting and it’s just in ‘carry mode’.
Great idea for more stealthy carry. Too cumbersome for weddings, etc … but then again that’s not what it was intended for.
Two thumbs up.
It’s a stupid design. Looking ok when you are not shooting photos. Once you take photos with the bag, it’s worse than ppl seeing your camera. At least, I will look at you more than 10 seconds.
Comment Now!