<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photographers Pay Attention SEO Works and it&#8217;s FREE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/photographers-pay-attention-seo-works-and-its-free/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/photographers-pay-attention-seo-works-and-its-free</link>
	<description>Wedding Photographer Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radu Vultur</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/photographers-pay-attention-seo-works-and-its-free/comment-page-1#comment-4278</link>
		<dc:creator>Radu Vultur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=10050#comment-4278</guid>
		<description>Yes, Steve&#039;s right. One single domain keeps readers focused in one place. And google too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Steve&#8217;s right. One single domain keeps readers focused in one place. And google too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/photographers-pay-attention-seo-works-and-its-free/comment-page-1#comment-4219</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=10050#comment-4219</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree strongly with having multiple domains - in fact, that will potentially have a negative impact. By having two (or more) domains, you are weakening your overall web presence (because you are splitting your content). 

You should have one strong website, rather than two weaker ones. Instead of this:

www.abcphotos.com &amp; www.abcphotosblog.com you should have:

www.abcphotos.com &amp; blog.abcophotos.com (or www,abcphotos.com/blog)

This way you are still getting cross links and inbound links BUT, all the content is on the one domain name (ie, you are strengthening your overall seo efforts on that one domain). 

For a good example.. Apple Inc. They used to have www.apple.com www.apple.ca www.apple.com.au etc etc Now - they just use www.apple.com as their master domain... and then use www.apple.com/ca www.apple.com/au www.apple.com/uk See the difference? Its huge.

Go to www.apple.com.au and take close notice of the URL.. it will change to www.apple.com/au Why? Because of the same prinicple as i mentioned above. Rather than having multiple sites that give them an OK search engine presence.. they are building up their master domain name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree strongly with having multiple domains &#8211; in fact, that will potentially have a negative impact. By having two (or more) domains, you are weakening your overall web presence (because you are splitting your content). </p>
<p>You should have one strong website, rather than two weaker ones. Instead of this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.abcphotos.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.abcphotos.com</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.abcphotosblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.abcphotosblog.com</a> you should have:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.abcphotos.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.abcphotos.com</a> &amp; blog.abcophotos.com (or www,abcphotos.com/blog)</p>
<p>This way you are still getting cross links and inbound links BUT, all the content is on the one domain name (ie, you are strengthening your overall seo efforts on that one domain). </p>
<p>For a good example.. Apple Inc. They used to have <a href="http://www.apple.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com</a> <a href="http://www.apple.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.ca</a> <a href="http://www.apple.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com.au</a> etc etc Now &#8211; they just use <a href="http://www.apple.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com</a> as their master domain&#8230; and then use <a href="http://www.apple.com/ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/ca</a> <a href="http://www.apple.com/au" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/au</a> <a href="http://www.apple.com/uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/uk</a> See the difference? Its huge.</p>
<p>Go to <a href="http://www.apple.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com.au</a> and take close notice of the URL.. it will change to <a href="http://www.apple.com/au" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/au</a> Why? Because of the same prinicple as i mentioned above. Rather than having multiple sites that give them an OK search engine presence.. they are building up their master domain name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James W</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/photographers-pay-attention-seo-works-and-its-free/comment-page-1#comment-4217</link>
		<dc:creator>James W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=10050#comment-4217</guid>
		<description>Great advice, for those photographers that may be interested Photoshelter.com and Adorama provide a free book on SEO, you can find it at:  http://www.photoshelter.com/mkt/seo-kit-for-photographers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice, for those photographers that may be interested Photoshelter.com and Adorama provide a free book on SEO, you can find it at:  <a href="http://www.photoshelter.com/mkt/seo-kit-for-photographers" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoshelter.com/mkt/seo-kit-for-photographers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Stagi - bay area wedding photography</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/photographers-pay-attention-seo-works-and-its-free/comment-page-1#comment-4202</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Stagi - bay area wedding photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=10050#comment-4202</guid>
		<description>You are right, link, links, links are key!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, link, links, links are key!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/photographers-pay-attention-seo-works-and-its-free/comment-page-1#comment-4181</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=10050#comment-4181</guid>
		<description>Another interesting tip I heard is by having your blog a separate domain name than your main website. This way every image/post that links to your portfolio counts as an &quot;inbound link&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another interesting tip I heard is by having your blog a separate domain name than your main website. This way every image/post that links to your portfolio counts as an &#8220;inbound link&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

