Cave Painting

Understanding what happens in your client’s brains when they look at your work could help you make your work better. Whaaaat?

There has been a bit of buzz on DWF lately about the rules of composition, and whether those rules have any meaning.  To some photographers, those rules are arbitrary concepts dreamed up by guys in togas.  To others, they are the law.  Like the laws of gravity.  Like Drive 55.

In “The Creation and Appreciation of Art in Photography” Charles S. Johnson, Jr. presents a different take on the argument.  Art is a result of consciousness, and the way we perceive it is the result of two things:   The viewer’s brain function and the viewer’s psychology. It is a very science-y way to look at it, but this article may help you decided whether or not it is worth it to learn those rules you’ve heard so much about.

Need help deciding whether you don’t need no stinkin’ rules? 

One of the world’s top wedding photographers, David Beckstead, has started a well-attended food fight discussion about the rules of composition on the DWF.  Visit the thread!  

Not a DWF member?  Grab a free trial.

Back Home

Possibly Related Posts: