<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Anti Uncle Bob Bag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-anti-uncle-bob-bag/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-anti-uncle-bob-bag</link>
	<description>Wedding Photographer Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-anti-uncle-bob-bag/comment-page-1#comment-13047</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 20:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=2138#comment-13047</guid>
		<description>brilliant idea!!  I can put two spare SB900s set to M 1/1 in SU-4 mode with the light pattern set to &quot;even&quot; on my BlackRapid DR-1.  I get nice fill and uncle bob goes nuts, LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brilliant idea!!  I can put two spare SB900s set to M 1/1 in SU-4 mode with the light pattern set to &#8220;even&#8221; on my BlackRapid DR-1.  I get nice fill and uncle bob goes nuts, LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geo</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-anti-uncle-bob-bag/comment-page-1#comment-13038</link>
		<dc:creator>Geo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=2138#comment-13038</guid>
		<description>To Dan....just look in the mirror to lay the blame. It&#039;s always much easier to blame others for one&#039;s shortcomings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Dan&#8230;.just look in the mirror to lay the blame. It&#8217;s always much easier to blame others for one&#8217;s shortcomings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-anti-uncle-bob-bag/comment-page-1#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=2138#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Buyer&#039;s remorse? Some. 

Price over Quality? Try getting far less quality than you paid for. Problem is, you can&#039;t just go with someone else at this point since the event and pictures can&#039;t be reproduced/retaken. One shot is all you get. 

There are worse situations: the photographer at my cousin&#039;s wedding used film, and none of it turned out. None. She had to rely solely on guests&#039; photos, but at least she got her money back. 

The only retribution/repayment available in my situation is this:
*I won&#039;t be buying any adjusted photos from the company- at $20 a pop and with me having exclusive rights to all photos (full-res. digital copy, see above) that can be done by myself, at done much better at that. 
*Instead of getting the &#039;free&#039; photos for giving favorable reviews on 5 or 6 wedding sites, they&#039;ll get the opposite. Sorry, I can&#039;t be bribed that easily.

That was for you, George, since you were wondering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buyer&#8217;s remorse? Some. </p>
<p>Price over Quality? Try getting far less quality than you paid for. Problem is, you can&#8217;t just go with someone else at this point since the event and pictures can&#8217;t be reproduced/retaken. One shot is all you get. </p>
<p>There are worse situations: the photographer at my cousin&#8217;s wedding used film, and none of it turned out. None. She had to rely solely on guests&#8217; photos, but at least she got her money back. </p>
<p>The only retribution/repayment available in my situation is this:<br />
*I won&#8217;t be buying any adjusted photos from the company- at $20 a pop and with me having exclusive rights to all photos (full-res. digital copy, see above) that can be done by myself, at done much better at that.<br />
*Instead of getting the &#8216;free&#8217; photos for giving favorable reviews on 5 or 6 wedding sites, they&#8217;ll get the opposite. Sorry, I can&#8217;t be bribed that easily.</p>
<p>That was for you, George, since you were wondering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-anti-uncle-bob-bag/comment-page-1#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=2138#comment-430</guid>
		<description>Buyer&#039;s remorse ? Price over quality ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buyer&#8217;s remorse ? Price over quality ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-anti-uncle-bob-bag/comment-page-1#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=2138#comment-409</guid>
		<description>So, Uncle Bob likes to position himself behind you and to the side to get similarly framed photos. Do you put one of these on your shoulder strap facing backwards? Kind of defeats the ninja-black mantra of photojournalist style, however fun it would be to see that type back the hell off. 

I think you&#039;d have to do some work to allow adjustment of the photo sensor as not to piss off the guests. 

Speaking of Uncle Bob, I sure hope those at our recent wedding were busy. (Our wedding as in when *we* got married.) We got the proofs back, and it looked like the guy hadn&#039;t tried to shoot anything outside a studio before! Not to mention, many of events just plain weren&#039;t covered. It&#039;s looking like we may have to rely on the many of the photos from the guests to make a decent album.

I might be willing to dislike Uncle Bob a little less after this, but I guess that&#039;s what we get when you look at a large chain&#039;s work and expect a single employee to produce the same results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Uncle Bob likes to position himself behind you and to the side to get similarly framed photos. Do you put one of these on your shoulder strap facing backwards? Kind of defeats the ninja-black mantra of photojournalist style, however fun it would be to see that type back the hell off. </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;d have to do some work to allow adjustment of the photo sensor as not to piss off the guests. </p>
<p>Speaking of Uncle Bob, I sure hope those at our recent wedding were busy. (Our wedding as in when *we* got married.) We got the proofs back, and it looked like the guy hadn&#8217;t tried to shoot anything outside a studio before! Not to mention, many of events just plain weren&#8217;t covered. It&#8217;s looking like we may have to rely on the many of the photos from the guests to make a decent album.</p>
<p>I might be willing to dislike Uncle Bob a little less after this, but I guess that&#8217;s what we get when you look at a large chain&#8217;s work and expect a single employee to produce the same results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

