<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New York Times Likes Naked Brides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-new-york-times-likes-naked-brides/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-new-york-times-likes-naked-brides</link>
	<description>Wedding Photographer Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-new-york-times-likes-naked-brides/comment-page-1#comment-2611</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=523#comment-2611</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a clue Mike, don&#039;t enter the forum if it offends you. Just because you don&#039;t like it doesn&#039;t mean that it is unacceptable. I really mean that with all due respect and kindness. I hope it didn&#039;t come across to harsh.

Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a clue Mike, don&#8217;t enter the forum if it offends you. Just because you don&#8217;t like it doesn&#8217;t mean that it is unacceptable. I really mean that with all due respect and kindness. I hope it didn&#8217;t come across to harsh.</p>
<p>Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike hall</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/the-new-york-times-likes-naked-brides/comment-page-1#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>mike hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalweddingforum.com/blog/?p=523#comment-798</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why this soft core porn Boudoir photography is so big with Wedding photographer.  Bridals and Engagements - yes, Boudoir - no.  DWF should be ashamed that they are pushing this soft core porn.  The even have a separate category for it.  Shame on DWF.  I joined for the Wedding, not the Boudoir.  I think DWF should take the Boudoir categories out.  DWF is no place for the soft core porn.  Someone needs to tell it like it is!   Any decent photographer out there like to agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why this soft core porn Boudoir photography is so big with Wedding photographer.  Bridals and Engagements &#8211; yes, Boudoir &#8211; no.  DWF should be ashamed that they are pushing this soft core porn.  The even have a separate category for it.  Shame on DWF.  I joined for the Wedding, not the Boudoir.  I think DWF should take the Boudoir categories out.  DWF is no place for the soft core porn.  Someone needs to tell it like it is!   Any decent photographer out there like to agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

